If you "tire" of McCain's continuous string of nonsense, and feel obligated to learn the truth, I must "pressure" you to read this post (although only you can "gauge" its significance).
SUMMARY: Obama suggested that inflating one's tires more would be a good way for them to save gas. This is backed up by numerous scientific studies. However, McCain criticized Obama's suggestion. Then, a few days later, he conceded that it was a good tip. Then, the next day, he criticized it again.
More...
At a rally last Thursday in Ohio, Obama mentioned that one way for consumers to improve their mileage would be to make sure their tires were properly inflated. The McCain camp jumped all over this remark, criticizing it for being an insignificant measure and implying that tire inflation constituted the majority of Obama's energy policy. At a campaign stop yesterday, McCain said:
“We need to offshore drill for oil and natural gas. We need to drill here and we need to drill now...We’re not going to achieve energy independence by inflating our tires.”
Furthering the attack, McCain had his campaign staff hand out tire gauges with the words "Obama's Energy Policy" on them to members of the press. It's amusing (and sad) that this is probably one of the classier attacks McCain has waged within the last week or so.
Anyway, there are a few problems with this attack. First off, Obama was right - inflating your tires does increase your mileage. According to a study from the University of Pennsylvania (aptly titled "Energy Conservation From Systematic Tire Pressure Regulation"):
The study indicates that substantial benefits would accrue if car care facilities systematically offered complimentary tire pressure checks with oil changes including: (i) increased safety by decreasing all crashes and saving more than 100 lives per year, (ii) reduced petroleum consumption by over a billion gallons/year, which would (iia) provide over $4 billion in economic savings for US consumers that could in part be recouped in retail/auto-care facilities, (iib) reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 13.5 million tons and automobile pollution...
Time Magazine ran an article confirming that this is true:
The Bush Administration estimates that expanded offshore drilling could increase oil production by 200,000 bbl. per day by 2030. We use about 20 million bbl. per day, so that would meet about 1% of our demand two decades from now. Meanwhile, efficiency experts say that keeping tires inflated can improve gas mileage 3%, and regular maintenance can add another 4%. Many drivers already follow their advice, but if everyone did, we could immediately reduce demand several percentage points. In other words: Obama is right.
Second off, McCain and his campaign are clearly attempting to imply that Obama's suggestion constituted the bulk of his energy policy, which simply isn't true. It was an offhand response to a question asked about what individuals could do to improve their situation - it had nothing to do with Obama's energy policy; it was meant only as a helpful tip.
So I suppose that it's only reasonable that McCain backtracked, and admitted that Obama's suggestion was a good one. At a town hall meeting today in Pennsylvania, he remarked:
“Obama said a couple of days ago says we all should inflate our tires. I don’t disagree with that. The American Automobile Association strongly recommends it."
Good! McCain realized the error in his ways, and attempted to clear it up. Surely he won't go back on his word the very next day while speaking to voters in Ohio. Oh, wait a second...
"He's claiming putting air in your tires is the equivalent of new offshore drilling," McCain said. "That's not an energy plan, my friends -- that's a public service announcement."
So, let's recap.
1. Obama correctly states that inflating your tires is a good way to save on gas.
2. McCain criticizes Obama for saying this, despite the fact that, by the Bush Administration's own estimates, Obama's offhand suggestion would save more money than than the entirety of McCain's offshore drilling plans.
3. McCain has his campaign hand out satirical tire gauges with the phrase "Obama's Energy Plan" printed on them.
4. McCain then admits that Obama's idea was pretty good.
4. McCain then criticizes Obama again for his suggestion the day after conceding that it was valid.
Now's probably a good time for me to point out that, while I try to use an objective tone in writing this blog (in order for it to maintain its credibility), that's getting kind of difficult.
Is McCain completely oblivious to how irresponsible he's been acting? Is he even aware of what's going on? Does he bother looking into the facts behind his positions before stating them? Does he even think about what he's about to say before speaking? I've said it before, and I'll say it again. I don't think that McCain is necessarily a bad person, but he is coming off as more and more senile by the week.
- obama (14)
- attack ad (7)
- iraq (4)
- taxes (3)
- anbar (2)
- bounds (2)
- gas prices (2)
- health care (2)
- offshore drilling (2)
- palin (2)
- troops (2)
- Abdul Sattar Abu Risha (1)
- afghanistan (1)
- al Qaeda (1)
- czechoslovakia (1)
- energy (1)
- fiorina (1)
- geography (1)
- germany (1)
- goldfarb (1)
- gustav (1)
- iran (1)
- katrina (1)
- maliki (1)
- new york times (1)
- oil (1)
- paris hilton (1)
- pledge of allegiance (1)
- rnc (1)
- spokesman (1)
- surge (1)
- surrogate (1)
- tire pressure (1)
- veterans (1)
- viagra (1)
- voting record (1)
Disclaimer
All information contained herein is sourced. I try to find government sources when I can; failing that, I retrieve them from the news media. If any statement made on here is incorrect, please click the "Contact" link above and let me know. If I have indeed included a false or misleading piece of information, I will promptly remove it.
FAQ
Q: From where do you get your information?
A: Every piece of information I reference is sourced within the post. I despise dishonesty in journalism, and, while I wouldn't quite go so far as to call myself a journalist, I adhere to a policy of honest reporting. I always get as close to the source as possible, often providing more sources than the articles from which I initially get the stories. If something I write is ever found to be false, I will remove it immediately.
Q: Barack Obama has made mistakes, too. Why aren't you writing a blog about his missteps?
A: Well, first of all, that wouldn't be nearly as lengthy or entertaining of a blog. Second of all, I want Obama to become the next president, so making a blog chronicling his shortcomings would be a bit self-defeating. However, if you'd like to make such a blog, please, feel free. If it's honest, I'll even link to it from here.
Q: Wait! You support Obama! That means this blog is biased. I shouldn't trust the information I get here.
A: If by "biased" you mean that I support one candidate over another, well, yeah. I can't conceive of a neutral party taking the time to construct a blog of this nature. However, that doesn't mean that you shouldn't trust the information on this blog. As I said above, every piece of information here is sourced and accurate. If you find anything that's not, please contact me and I'll remove it.
Q: I like/don't like the cut of your jib. Where can I contact you?
A: My e-mail is at the top of this page.